________________
with reference to that word." This reminds us of Mammata's definition of a Vācaka sabda (K. P. 11. 7 - Vrtti). And Sanketa is of one type only because it cannot be placed on a word to yield a special meaning for fear of the fault of endlessness and infringement of the rule; just as it cannot be made with reference to a sentence to yield the sentence - meaning. For, the connection of general word-meanings (in a sentence) comes about owing to expectancy (Akānkşā), compatibility (Yogyatā) and proximity (Sannidhi). This is the view of the Abhihitānvayavādins. Mammata deals with this view in his Kāvyaprakāśa (V. 47 ff). The Tātparya Theory
We can see that here Hemachandrachārya introduces a discussion of the Tātparya theory of the Mimāmsakas. The first of the Tatparyavādins are the Abhihitānvayavādins who hold that the purport-sense also belongs to the word when the senses of words are combined together owing to the force of expectancy, compatibility and proximity. The purport sense, which possesses a special form, and which, though not the sense of the different words, represents the sense of the sentence, springs up - this is the view of those who maintain that connection arises between senses after they are expressed by the different words. 'Vācya eva vākyārthaḥ - the expressed sense is the sentence sense - thus hold those who maintain that words express a connected meaning. These are the Anvitābhidhānavādins. This is the fourth Vịtti i.e., over and above Abhidhā, Laksaņā and Vyañjanä, though Hemachandra does not explain it. Abhinavagupta enumerates the different powers in this order : Abhidhā, Tätparya, Laksanā and Vyañjanā. Thus according to him, Vyañjanā is the fourth Vịtti.
Mammața defines and explains the Tātparyavrtti and Hemachandra depends mainly on him and the Dhvanikāra as well as Abhinavagupta. We can pinpoint words, quotations, examples and ideas in both the body of the text of the
139
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org