________________
216
Studies in Jainology, Prakrit
REFERENCES AND NOTES
Paper published in Puskara Muni Feli. Vol., Udaipur, 1980. Of course admitting the changes effected by time, of which we have no record. Thus the two traditions regarding the preservation of the canonical knowledge complement each other to a certain extent. Vide Introduction to Satkhandāgama Vol.l., by Dr.H.L.Jain, Amaravati, 1939, p.iii. In his Gujarat and its Literature, Longmans, Green and Co., Ltd., Bombay 1935, p.32. In his History of Indian Literature, Vol.II, Calculia 1933, pp.394-95. (i) Vide Jainism in South India and Some Jaina Epigraphs, by Dr.P.B.Desai, Solapur 1957, pp.18 ff, and Daksina Bharat mem Jaina Dharma by Pt.K.C.Shastri, Varanasi, 1967, Intro.pp.i-iii. (ii) Vide also Antiquity of Jainism in South India, Indian Culture, Vol.IV, pp.512-516. Vide Pl.K.C.Shastri, op.cit., pp.62-72. Noted by Dr.P.B.Desai, op.cit, p.15. For details on this topic vide Jaina Literature in Tamil, by Prof.A.Chakravarti, First Revised Edition, Delhi 1974. For the dates of these Tamil works, some of which are controversial, I have mainly depended on the History of Tamil language and literature, by Prof.S.Vaiyapuri Pillai, Madras, 1956. There has been also a lot of controwersy on the authorship of this grcat work: Some scholars have claimed that the
on si
o
10.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
