Traverses on Less Trodden Path of Indian Philosophy and Religion

SR No.: 001577
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Yajneshwar S Shastri
Publisher: L D Indology Ahmedabad
Publication Year: 1991
Total Pages: 302
Language: English
Classification: Book_English & Philosophy
File Size: 20 MB

Page 12

Reconciliation of different philosophical view-points
and immediate, prove only one thing that every object has innumerable aspects. Each entity is one in many. We are all imperfect human beings. We cannot comprehand an object in its totality and our view of it is limited. We are really wrong when we emphasize and say that our view is perfect and final. An object or reality is to be understood in its totality, To view a thing, thus, not only from a single point of view, but to exą. mine it from all possible points of view is the real meaning of the doctrine of anekāntavāda.
The notion of reality is a characteristic example of Jaina anekantavada. Reality (substance) consists of production, destruction and permanence, A substance is permanent in respect of its essential qualities and also subject to generation and destruction in regard to its changing modifications. When a substance, conscious or unconscious originates without leaving its own nature, it is called origination. Destruction is loss of existence in a thing that had it before. Permanence is the essential characteristic of substance, which remains unchanged in both the conditions, viz. in origination and decay. To cite an example, a jar, originates from clay without leaving the nature of clay; clay leaves its former mode or shape when it becomes a jar and the essential nature of clay remains unchanged in both the conditions. These three, differ in their nature but they are not mutually independent. Change and permanence, modes and substance exist together, neither is possible without the other, But permanence and change are not applied to a thing in one and the same capacity but in different capacity. . There is no contradiction involved and no violation of law of contradiction in applying opposite predicates t the same thing in different capacities, because, they are applied to its different aspects such as matter, state, space and time. It is seen that mutually centra. dictory elements can exist in one and the same thing in different capacity such as, the same man is a father to his son, son to his father, husband to his wife, and so on.? In fact, the positive and negative aspects must both belong to everything. If only the positive aspects belong to it, there would be nothing to distinguish it from another and all things would become one 'sat. If instead, only the negative aspects belong to a tbing, 4 Tattvārthasūtra, V-29, Part-I, ed. H. R. Kapadia, Pub : J. S. Javeri, Bombay, 1925, 5 Syādvādamanjari (S.M.), XIV, ed. : A. B. Dhruva, Pub : Bombay Sanskrit and
Prakrit Series, 1933, p. 92. 6 (a) Ibid, XIV, p. 92.
(b) Aptamimamsā-Vytti by Vasunandi, 47, Devāgama-Vịtti, ed, and trans. K. B. Nitve. Kolhapur. 7 (a) Sarvärthasiddhi, V-32, Pub : K. B. Nitve, Kolhapur, Sake 1839, p. 17. (b) Tattvārtharājavārtika, 1-6, ed. Gajadharlal Jain, Pub. : Sagatana Jaina Gran
thamala, Kasi, 1915, p. 26.