________________
Inscriptions
103
the same as the 'bhāndāgārika Jindaka' noted in the foregoing. (In any case, there is no qualifier 'Maham.' for Jindaka.) Another inscription, of A.D. 1089 (Insc. 36), gives further details of that family on the basis of which his short family tree can be worked out as under:
Jindaka
Durlabhadevī = Maham. Šānti = Pāhiņi
(A.D. 1082)
daughters Dehrī
Śīlamati
Sāthī (A.D. 1089)
3. Yaśonāga mahattama
An inscription of A.D. 1091 (Insc. 15) in the Mahāvīra temple refers to him as of Naddula (Nādol) where, at the Cāhamāna court, he assumably may have occupied a ministerial office.
4. Mahas. Risideva
His name appears in the inscription of A.D. 1148 (Insc. 80) in the Neminātha temple.
5. Mahań. Varadeva
His name occurs in two image-epigraphs of A.D. 1158 (Insc. 89, 90), again in the Neminātha temple.
Maham. Bahadā(ka)
He is mentioned in two inscriptions dated S.1259/A.D. 1203 (Insc. 57, 60). He may have been a minister of the Paramāra chief Dhārāvarşadeva of Candrāvatī.
Hei
7. Mahāmātya Ambāka
The inscription of A.D. 1207 (Insc. 140) in the group of sundry donative records mentions this dignitary who apparently was the minister at the Caulukya court.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
