________________
125
4. This fast portion is quite obscure and it is also metrically defective. Most likely it contained a Deśya item with its gloss and also the name of the dialect. Daniélou and Bhatt assume that the name of the dialect is gemacht. But it is uncertain. 379erg, 375g or 3791284 is metrically untenable in the final position. They violate the structure of
the Gātha Items identified : 1 Traffiti AIT 'mountain-village'.
3. HASIEHTİTTY 'bee'.
[ 38. qfEgH-HAT/GAFAT ] DB. पचमभासो भणिया मयण x x x xx रो तीरं । .
गीयं गुट्टाबद्ध र जांजालं वत्थं व ॥१८ R. FJH-HIAT-HIUT 201......231 ati i
a 1974 (?)...35 FS (?)4 789 (?) 711 Notes : 1. The name of the dialect is unclear. There is no
support for taking it to be equivalent to act as is done by Daniélou and Bhatt. पचय-भासा is
possibly a corruption of lega-HAT. 1. 2. There were possibly two Deśya words with their
glosses in the latter portion of the first line. The last word seems to be the gloss of the preced.
ing Desya word which is lost 3. गुठावद्ध is otherwise unknown in the sense of गीय
'song'. 4. The last Deśya item and its gloss are not clear.
DN. 1, 136 notes Fit i e, in the senses of बलात्कार- and दीर्घ
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
