________________
114
INTRODUCTION
4.23 khavei
thavei 5.75 viambhia
vilambia 5.85 uddbāanta
rundāvatta 6.12 khaa-dukkālāņuaram khaa-kālāņala-khaviam 6.37 vihuvvantā
viijjantā 7.21 vilagga
païņņa! 7.37 milijjantā
maïjjantā 8.3 ukkampā
uppida 8.40 thāma (also in 15.19) thāha? 8.104 galia-paāva-khuhio pelavāņattiaro 9.85 °kkhambhālia
okkhambha-nialia3 11.95 uppāa
upphāla 14.51 Zaria
āsāia 15.31 sumbhanta
muccanta 15.46 padhama-ppahāra-mahio visahia-padhama-ppaharo
While Rāmadāsa and Kulanātha agree in many of their readings as against the South Indians, there is a considerable number of readings in which they differ from each other; and in such cases Kulanātha usually follows the South Indian readings, leaving Rāmadāsa practically isolated. For example, Rāmadasa
South Indians and Kulanātha 2.12 ņipphaņņa
ņivvadia 3.20 ahia
adhia 3.33 dūranta
tūranta
1 This is also the reading of Lokanātha. See Extracts 7.21. 2 In 15.19 Rāmadāsa reads thāma like the South Indians. 3 Goldschmidt (see his footnote on 9.85) rejects Rāmadāsa's reading "kkhambha-nialia
on the ground that it is against the metre, but there is no metrical difficulty in the line as read in SC (9.84) which follows Kulanātha. Goldschmidt's reading okkhambhallia is a conjecture based on stambhālina found in Krşna's chāyā. The South Indian reading as recorded by Madhava is, however, okkhambhalia which appears to be rendered by Krşņa as stambhālīna. See also Extracts 9.85.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
