________________
148
प्राकृतसर्वस्वन् ।
met with in the works of Pu and Rt. As has been rightly observed by NITTI, Rt of the three eastern grammarians owes the most to Hemacandra. It is therefore natural that he has some rules which are not found in Mk's work. Moreover there are a number of differences between the two authors which go to show that both had independently composed their grammars despite having a common source with them. Tu number a few diffierences the following examples deserve notice :
Mahārāștri
Mk.
Rt.
(a) tālavemtam, ( talavemtam) ... talavimtam, I. 1.6.
(tâlavrntam I, 13 (cf. Bhān.
I, 10) (b ) sał ( sadā ), I. 14 ( against ... saī or saā, I. 1.8.
optional saā, cf. Bhām 1. 11) (c) dohāiain or duḥāiam (dvidhū- ... duhūkaum or do
krtam)I. 19 (cf. Bhām. 1.16) hākaam, 1. 1. 9. (d) Short è in place of long i in ... The long i can
the gļhita class, I. 21 (cf. also be retained, Bhām. 1. 18 )
I. 1. 11 (e) jahitthilo ( yudhisthiraḥ ),1.26 ... Optionally also (cf. Bhām. I. 22 )
juhitthilo, I. 1. 13. (f) maūli, moli ( mauli ), I. 50 ... Only maili,1.1.24 (g) sebhāliā ( sephālikā ), II. 24 ... Optionally seha(cf. Bbām. II. 26 )
liā, I. 2.7 (h) i>n is optionally allowed in ... The same is oblilārgūla class, II. 39
gatory I. 2.15
5. See Les Gram. p. 108, also footnote, p. 101.
6. Here Mk. remarks, 'prădurădivad dhātunā saha aikapadyabhāvāccānāditvam'.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
