________________
176 ] .. SANMATI-TARKA [ III. 56-59
दव्वट्ठियवत्तव्वं सामरणं पज्जवस्स य विसेसो। एए समोवणीआ विभजवायं विसेसेंति ॥ ५७ ॥ हेउविसोवणीअ जह वयणिज्ज परो नियत्तेइ । जइ तं तहा पुरिल्लो दाइंतो केण जिव्वंतो ॥५८ ।। एयंताऽसब्भूयं सब्भूयमणिच्छियं च वयमाणो । लोइय-परिच्छियाणं वयणिजपहं पडइ वादी ॥ ५९॥
(56) When Ekāntavādi (Radicalist) establishes a conclusion by Sadharmya (Similari. ty; analogy) or Vaidharmya (dissimilarity), they both result in an Asadvada.
(57) Noumenal view-point is concerned with Samanya. (general) and Phenomenal view-point with Visesa (particular). When they are employed independently, they give rise to Radical view-point. ....(58) The opponent disproves the Sadhya (major term) which is going to be proved by Hetu (Middle term) because it has been put in an objectionable way. Who would have conquered the Vādi who has employed the major term as it ought to be employed ?
(59) Vadi who speaks utter falsehood or who makes an indefinite statement even
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org