Book Title: Vimala Period Sculptures in Vimal Vashi
Author(s): M A Dhaky
Publisher: Z_Aspect_of_Jainology_Part_2_Pundit_Bechardas_Doshi_012016.pdf
Catalog link: https://jainqq.org/explore/250364/1

JAIN EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL FOR PRIVATE AND PERSONAL USE ONLY
Page #1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ THE VIMALA PERIOD SCULPTURES IN VIMALA-V ASAHI M. A. Dhaky The Vimala-vasahi and its ornate marble interior are sufficiently famous to warrant omission of a eulogistic preamble. The vasati's history, chronology, and achitectural description I have dealt with at length in earlier publications, though up to a relevant point a succinct recapitulation with a few minor modifications to my earlier conclusions I will include in the present discussion. In c. A. D. 1030 or perhaps a few years before that date, Jaina Vimala of the Pragavata caste of the vaisyas of Bhillamala' had been appointed dandanayaka, political and military agent-resident at Candravati (capital of the Paramaras of Arbudamandala or Abu) by king Bhimadeva I of the Solankis or Caulukyas of Anhillapataka. Vimala eventually founded the temple for Jina Rsabha at the village Deulavadagrama' sited on a low eminence on the plateau Mt. Abu. As the later prabandhas narrate, he had difficulty in getting land for his temple from the Sivaite owners whom he apparently had to pay high price in bargains. The cult image of this temple was consecrated by Vardhamana suri of Candragacchae in V. S. 1088/A. D. 1032 as reliable medieval literary sources report?. A few posterior Solanki inscriptions inside the building attest to Vimala's authorship of the temple Vimala's building, however, was modest in size and meagrely ornamented. The architect he employed had used the local dark stone of questionable quality, instead of the elegant marble of Candravati or Arasana, apparently for want of funds or due to the still undeveloped transportation facilities to lift and move the heavy material up on the mountain-plateau from the quarries of Arasana". The dark mulaprasada (sancturay) is above 25 ft. in width, having a few shallow angaproliferations on plan and a meagrely moulded elevation. The superstructure is a low tiered pyramidal roof, its height restricted by the fact of its shallow foundations since the building perches on bare, possibly partially prepared, flat, rock surface that gently sloped toward the east. The gudhamandapa (closed hall) conjoined to the mulaprasada is and, to all seeming, there was an original open trika, or mukhamandapa (pillared portico), to front the closed hall in the design of Vimala's foundation. The building possibly was surrounded by a prakara-wall presumably with an unpretentious gate at the east. A few, small, free-standing devakulika-chapels may within decades have been added to in the courtyard along the northern and southern flanks11. But the major addition to the complex, as one of the prabandhas relates12, was made by Cahilla, a brother (or rather son) of Vimala13, of a Page #2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ The Vimala Sculptures in Vimala-Vasahi 97 rangamandapa, or columnar hall, a mukhacatuski to the prakara as eastern entrance, a hastisala (elephant court) facing this east porch of the prakara, and a torana set up very close to the eastern opening of the former court, all (like the original portions of the Vimala's building) constructed in black stone:14 This Cahilla may be identified with the mahasandhivigrahika Cahila figuring in the Caulukya Karnadeva's charter of S. 1146/A. D. 1090 granted to the Jaina temple at Takovill. The dullness of the plain black stone interior of Vimala's original building can be imagined. When, in the 12th century, the Solanki empire of Gujarat reached the zenith of its power, Psthvipala, a minister of emperor Kumarapala and also descendent of the Vimala's family,--he being Vimala's great grand nephew,--not only replaced the original Trika or mukhamand apa as well as the rangamandapa of black stone by two magnificent new marble halls, but also planned completely to enclose the entire central complex by a surround of devakulikas-chapels with a colonnaded pattasala cloister, all done in glistening marble. The larger part of these additions were built by the munificence of Prthvipala and subsequently by his son Dhanapala. The main refurbishment programme had started c. 1144 and completed c. 1150, though the devakulikas were continued to be added till c. A. D. 1189. Almost the total splendour of the Vimala-vasahi's interior thus owes to Prthvipala, Dhanapala (and, to a smaller extent to a few other donors, like their distant cousins Hemarathi and Dasaratha, and Minister Yasovira of Jabalipura, and a few others from the lay followers Svetambara sect.) The question is whether there exist any sculpture of interest and of worthiness inside this temple complex which could date from Vimala period. My four exploratory visits to this temple undertaken between 1959 and 1975 helped locating at least six images which, judging by their style, can definitely be ascribed to Vimala's times. The otherwise undecorated prasada-walls, which very largely are of Vimala's period, still possesses three Jina images in marble (Plates 1-3), one each in the bhadra-khattaka, are stylistically of the early 11th century and hence they conceivably are of Vimala's times. Excepting in the southern bhadra-khattaka where the bimba or image proper seems of the restoration period (c. A. D. 1322), the rest is all original, and thus pertain to the original foundation. With minor differences in rendering, the details of the lion throne and the ornamental parikara-frame in each case of the three examples are identical. The simhasana shows Sarvanubhuti and Ambika at the extremities, and next the lions, the elephants and the edgewise dharmacakra flanked by dears. The parikara in each instance contains two handsomely flexured camara-bearers, the Hiranyendra pair on elephant-backs, the maladharas, the souring adorent vidyadharas and, at the apex, a sankhapala or conch-blowing figure. The Sarvanubhuti-Ambika pair is rarely encountered after the 11th cent. A. D. The typical suave flexure of the camaradharas and the 13 Page #3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ 98 M. A. Dhaky characteristic grouping of the deeply undercut celestials above, the lotus aureole behind the Jina's head, and the edge-wise dharmacakra are features commonly met with in the elaborate Jina images of the second quarter of the 11th cent. A. D.. Similar elements, the general manner of composition, and the qualitative excellence image surrounds are noticeable in two contemporaneous larger images in marble (brought from some unrecorded site) now under worship in the Jaina temple at Beda (situated northeast of Mt. Abu) may be illustrated here by way of comparison (Plates 4 and 5). In these two almost identical examples, the dharmacakra is disposed face-wise; and a triple umbrella is additionally shown since the images are sufficiently large to accommodate that mahapratiharya or glory-feature. Stylistically, the images may date from c. middle of the 11th cent. A. D. The small differences seen in the two Bela images may be explained by another image in the same group which stylistically precedes in time even to the Vimala vasahi examples (Plate 6). The image seemingly belongs to the earlier part of the 10th century. The compositional elements are grouped with more space between the postures, though formal, are more animated. The overall mannerism of the composition reveals different graphics, of the tradition of paintings to be precise. The image being larger than all the preceding shown her, could also include a female attendant beside the two male camara-bearers. All these attendants are provided with plain oblong haloes, a reminiscence of the pre-medieval traditions. A still earlier image with conventions ancestral to these all is the marble Jina image inside Brahmana (Varman)'s Jaina temple (Plate 7), the image, like the older parts of the temple, stylistically may be dated to c. late 9th cent. A. D. Hiranyendras and the sakhapala are absent since it is an early sculpture. The camarabearers, particularly the right one of the two, has body flexure even more graceful than all previously discussed. This Brahmana image represents the pure Gurjaradesa tradition, the other images incorporate a few Maru elements and mannerism in their shaping. One of the devakulika chapel at the south-eastern corner of the Vimala vasahi temple contains three images of Yaksi Ambika, the two smaller at the flank of the middle large one are more ancient. One of them (Plate 8) has padmaprabha-aureole, in the other one the lotus petals of the prabha behave like flames (Plate 9). Not only the style of the aureole but also the style of the dhammila-crowns of the two examples is seldom met with after A. D. 1040; it is ubiquitous in the latter half of the tenth century in all Maha-Gurjara schools, Kaccha-Anarta, Arbuda and Medapata to be precise. The two marble images of Ambika, then, reasonably may be placed to Vimala's period and at least one (Plate 8) may date from the foundation of the temple, the other, although contemporaneous, may have been soon after installed or brought here at some later date from Arasana or Candravati or some such site in the Arbuda territory. Page #4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ The Vimala Period Sculptures in Vimala-Vasahi 99 By way of comparison I introduce here three less known images of Ambika indicating progressive motion toward ossification in rendering. Plate 10 is from the sanctum of Mahavira temple at Arasana, dateable to c. A. D. 1062. Its halo differs, so are the ornaments, flattened and stuck to the skin of body. (The Sarvanubhuti there, Plate 11, is also in the same style.) The crown preferred here is karnda; the general treatment and mannerism seem to derive from the so-called Sas temple at Nagada near Ahad in Mevad. One more examples of an image of Amba in Plate 12 is in a devakulika in the western bhramantika or colonnaded cloister of the Mahavira temple in Arasana. The fine suave features met with earlier, disappear here. The squarish face, the summarized ornaments, and the hardened mould indicates toward 12th or the 13th century A. D. The fifth image of Ambika (Plate 13) is from Mt. Girnar, installed in a late medieval small kulika near the southern porch of the gudhamanqapa of the Nemina tha temple. The general mannerism and idiom of treating the limbs,-legs, waist and torso--and face as well as ornaments and the amra-pallavi in the hands seem to remind the sculptures of Kumarapala's time inside the Vimala-vasahi additions and at other places. An inscription of S. 1215/A.D. 1159 in the northern porch of the bhramantika of the Neminatha temple refers to the installation of an Ambika image near Nagajhara 6. Plausibly this is the said image, removed from the original site at a later date to the kulika where it is found today. The blackened surface speaks of prolonged algae action on the marble of the very image, a fact which supports the supposition that it must be the very image mentioned in the inscription referred to in the foregoing lines. These last two iliustrations unhesitatingly prove the relative earliness of the Arasana Ambika in Plate 10, which in its turn clearly endorses the earliness of the style of the two Vimala-vasahi icons shown as Plates 8 and 9. The last illustration (Plate 14) apparently pertains not to Vimala's but his successor Cahilla's times. The hastisala of the vasati very plausibly was built by him. The pair of dvar apalakas placed at the eastern entrance still retains the gracefully swaying body of the times c. the mid eleventh century A. D. and are in any case not latter than Cahilla's period. (What is left out of discussion in this paper is the image in the forechamber of the southwestern extension of the bhramantika. This large black stone image, popularly known as of Jain Muni Suvrata and looked upon as 2500 years old, is, in fact, of Jaina Rsabha; it certainly was the original mulanayaka image of Vimala's temple and hence of A. D. 1032. Its pedestal is lost but the masuraka-seat bearing jewels on the front, the padmaparbha-aureole, the vyala-makara at the lateral of the throne, and the face and the hair style of the Jina's figure,-all proclaim early eleventh century as the age of the image. The image is not permitted to be photographed.) Page #5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ 100 M. A. Dhaky All the illustrations for this paper are by the courtesy and kindness of the American Institute of Indian Studies, Varanasi. Notes and References 1. Cf. "The Chronology of the Solanki Temples of Gujarat", Journal of the Madhya Pradesh Itihas Parishad, No. 3, 1961; also "Vimala-vasahi-ni Ketalika Samasyao" (Gujarati), Svadhyaya, Vol. IX, No. 3, V.S. 2028. 2. Bhillamala, from the 11th cent. A.D., is equally known as Srimala after the city's patron goddess Sri (Mahalaksmi). From late medieval times onward, the town is known as Bhinnamala. 3. Currently Patan. 4. Currently Delvada, anglicised Dilwara. 5. I forego citations since not relevant to be central facts of this paper. 6. This is the tradition recorded in the annals of the Kharatara-gaccha which traces its ultimate roots in this Vardhamana Suri. The alternative tradition, of the Tapa-gaccha records in particular, aver that the four acaryas of the four different kulas or sub-orders of monks,--Nagendra, Candra, Nirvstti and Vidyadhara-officiated the consecration rites. Again, I forego citing original sources since not serviceable to the main discussion. 8. For references pertaining to original sources, see my paper "Vimala vasahi-ni" earlier referred to 9. The town is currently known as Kumbharia where five Jaina and one Sivaite marble temples exist. The old township has disappeared, the sttlement shifted a mile to the west of Kumbharia, to what is known as Ambaji. 10. Very disappointingly so indeed. 11. The earliest Devakulika image-pedestal dates to S. 1121/A.D. 1065. 12. For discussion and references to the original sources, see my "Vimalava sahi-Ni.,' paper. 13. Ibid. 14. The torana and the grilled walls of the 'hastisala, the eastern mukhaca tuski and the mulaprasada (main shrine) and the gudhamandapa are still extant. The original trika and the rangamaxdapa were refurbished in marble in mid 12th cent. A. D. 15. Cf. Pt. Ambalal Premchand Shah, Jaina tirtha-Sarvasangraha (Gujarati) Vol. I, pt. 1, Ahmedabad 1953, p. For latest discussion and citation, see my "Ujjayantagiri and Jain Aristanemi", Journal of Indian Society of Oriental Art, NS, Vol. XI, 1980, p. 69, infra. Page #6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ 1. Seated Jina, northern bhadra khattaka, prasada, Vimala vasahi, Delvada., Mt. Abu. C. A. D. 1032 2. Seated Jina, western bhadra khattaka, Vimala vasahi. C. A. D. 1032. For Private & Persona Use Oni Page #7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ 3.Seated Jina, southern bhadrakhattaka, Vimala vasahi. A. D. 1032. 4. Seated Jina, Jaina temple. Beda. C. early 11th cent. A D. gelibrary.org Page #8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ 5. Stated Jina, Jaina temple Beda. C. early Ilth cent. A. D 6. Seated Jina, Jaina temple. Beda. C. early 10th cent. A. D. Page #9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ 7. Seated Jina, Jaina Temple, Varman. C. late 9th cent. A. D. 8. Ambika, Vimala vasahi, Delvada, Mt. Abu. C. A. D. 1032. For Private & Perso Page #10 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ 9. Ambika, Vimala vasahi, Delva C. A. D. 1032 10. Ambika, Mahavira temple, Kum bharia (Arasana). C. A. D. 1062 Page #11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ 11. Sarvanubhuti, Mahavira temple, Kumbharia. C. A. D. 1062 12. Ambika Mahavira temple, Kumbharia (Arasana), Devakulika in bhramantika. C. 12th or 13th cent. A. D. 10 Page #12 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ________________ 13. Ambika, Neminatha temple, Girnar. C. A. D. 1059. 14. Hastisala, torana-pillar and dvarapala, Vimala vasahi Delvada. C. mid 11th cent A. D. For Private & Personal Use On